If we wanted our textual content to be unreadably tiny, Freely accessible fetish-oriented XXX we might have advised our browser to display it that method. This one mugs viewers with 20" and 21" screens notably hard; since most fonts are scaled for 72dpi they're already 30% smaller than they ought to be at 100dpi. Anybody who use these tags for running textual content must be compressed by 30% themselves, slowly, and preferably in a machine with huge nasty spikes.

masturbation with Javascript There may be a large class of Javascript annoyances perpetrated by folks whose capacity to do reducing and pasting exceeds their negligible sense of style. Of those, considered one of the commonest is the script that scrolls text within the Netscape status line. To all the disadvantages of this one adds the very fact that you simply cannot see where links go any extra. Better than that, pages with 25K of Javascript adopted by
unnecessary use of Java There is one factor worse than your average garden-selection idiot internet designer, and that is the half-intelligent idiot who loves to ring in all the most recent know-how with out stopping to consider its aspect-results. One infamous Fortune 100 website, when it detects a Netscape browser, assumes you should be capable to help a fancy Java search applet - and if in case you have Java turned off for security reasons, you cannot search the site, because the perfectly ample CGI search you'd get for those who have been utilizing Lynx has been disabled. Moral: Keep It Simple, Stupid!

pop-up windows Some significantly irritating designers have discovered the magic method that causes your browser to spawn a brand new window if you click on a hyperlink - or worse, methods to make pop-up windows seem even if all you're attempting to do is exit their wretched hive of scum and villainy as rapidly as yow will discover the Back button. Stay in your individual window, dammit! The web is supposed to be about viewer management; designers who persist in rudely grabbing pieces of the viewer's screenspace without permission should be lashed with knouts.

menus made entirely from image maps Clue: tons of individuals use textual content-solely browsers like lynx, either because they need to (for speed) or as a result of they must (visual impairment, or lack of a graphics show). A complete page that shows up only as "[ISMAP]-[Image]" is ineffective. Designers who cannot be bothered to at least present a hyperlink to an alternate text menu are, on the very least, guilty of laziness and thoughtlessness. Huge image-maps are dangerous even for graphical browsers; they're slow-loading and needlessly frustrate users. And a pissed off user is a gone consumer.

sound and video that launches with out prompting About these embedded videos that just all of the sudden start playing by default, with out bothering to ask you if you'd like them to be played? No. You probably have advertisements on your site, advantageous, but when my loudspeakers all of the sudden start yelling about how I can win a ONE THOUSAND Dollar Gift CARD if I simply TAKE THIS SURVEY NOW you'll be able to take it to the bank that I would sooner lick sores at a leper colony than answer your survey or ever do any enterprise with you. And this is a hint to everybody who runs porn websites: most individuals who watch porn are not looking for the sounds of individuals having sex broadcast to everyone within a thirty-foot radius.

CSS that units fixed-dimension fonts dimensioned in pixels That is the idiot internet designer's favorite solution to make a site unreadable on a monitor with a finer dot pitch than the one he/she occurred to use. Guess what occurs while you set a 10 or 11px font on a 72dpi monitor and it gets seen on a 120dpi monitor? That's proper, immediate eyestrain and one other person cursing your name. This drawback is going to get worse as displays get bigger and finer-grained.

CSS that changes the hotlink colours Isn't it fun while you surf to a page and your eyes stall out trying to figure out which piece of textual content are hotlinks? That underlined blue and purple are beneficial navigational cues in the web jungle. If the page has multi-coloured links or links that are not easily distinguishable, then that is another case the place overriding the browser's settings should be punishable by intimate acquaintance with a flensing knife.

Forcing certainly one of background and text colour, but not each. Suppose I like my pages to default to inexperienced text on a black background? (Yes, I really got e mail from a reader who does this!) In the event you set your text colour to black, but don't set the background coloration, the positioning can be unreadable. If you set your background color to white (or worse still, orange - this has happened too!) but don't set the textual content colour, I will develop eyestrain and want a plague of creeping horrors on you. It isn't sensible to assume that the viewer has not fiddled with the default settings on their browser; either set both colours or neither.

background MIDI, Flash, Shockwave, and different abominations Background music takes endlessly to load, and isn't portable. Flash and Shockwave take without end to load, aren't portable, and are proprietary codecs that lock you into a single vendor. While you insult your viewers with crap like this, do not anticipate them back.