To avoid leading other people astray, https://vrpornsex.net/ please do not consult with movies utilizing the host title youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a hyperlink to invidio.us or one of many associated proxy websites. Lead folks to what is nice, not to what is bad! Just be certain that not to decide on a proxy that is "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software. This fashion of referring might be fail-secure: it could stop to work, but it can probably not start main people to run nonfree software program. There can be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that will not overcome the blockage of access via Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you ways I can't respond. I can't surrender to youtube's nonfree software program and surveillance. I get pleasure from getting access to the music and video there, however I will not do foolish or determined issues to keep that access. You shouldn't either! You don't need a particular "platform" to put up an audio or video on the net. You can publish an audio or video file on any internet site. Just put the file on the location and hyperlink to it as if it have been an unusual web page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored installation of Samsung's advert-blocker, saying that blocking adverts is "interference" with the sites that publicize (and surveil customers by way of advertisements). The advert-blocker is proprietary software, identical to the program (Google Play) that Google used to deny access to put in it. I'd refuse to have both of them on my pc. Using a nonfree program offers the proprietor energy over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To identify your self to a Google service is a grave error. - Google stores a listing of all purchases a person has made that in any approach point out the consumer's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this listing, however just one buy at a time. Then that buy disappears from the listing that the person sees. Whether it stays in another record, we have no idea, however I'd count on Google to answer that question with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, but the motive is irrelevant - as a result of it isn't an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", seems to have contained a microphone all along - but only just lately began listening.- Google "sanitizes" its whole search logs, then publishes them; but it surely declines to explain the means of "sanitization", and there is evidence that customers may be tracked by them.

The article also mentions two-issue authentication, which in and of itself might be a useful technique (although I've read that crackers can now defeat it), but has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is not to have a cell phone.

- Gmail was deliberate from the start as a large surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not solely of Gmail customers but of everybody who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly mixed its advert-tracking profiles with its browsing profiles.- Google has found a method to track most bank card purchases in the US, even these not performed by way of a telephone, and correlate that with folks's on-line actions.

Google cannot do both aspect to me, since I pay cash and do not carry a mobile phone, and it doesn't know what web pages I take a look at.

- Google Play sends app developers the private details of customers that install the app. Merely asking users' "consent" for this isn't enough to legitimize that. We know that most users have given up on studying just what they're "consenting" to, and the reason is that they're accustomed to being told, "If you'd like to make use of this service, you could consent to blah blah blah." To truly protect individuals's privateness, we must stop Google (and other firms) from getting this personal data in the primary place!- Google shops an enormous quantity of knowledge on each person. This can embody, along with the user's search historical past and promoting profile: - A timeline of the consumer's location throughout every day- Data on the utilization of non-Google cellphone apps- 'Deleted' emails and files uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privacy initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is involved with US authorities surveillance, abroad and within the US, amounts to quite a package.

Google invites individuals to let Google monitor their phone use, and all internet use of their properties, for an extravagant cost of $20.

This malicious functionality is not a secondary facet of a program with another purpose; that is the software program's sole objective, and Google says so. But Google says it in a way that encourages most people to disregard the details and stay unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize huge surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "smart" gadgets to report all exercise to them.

In different phrases, you probably have a "smart" (learn "spy") lightbulb with that proposed feature, and tell an Amazon or Google listening machine about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off irrespective of how, it could send a report back to Amazon or Google.

Even as we speak, the only way to make "smart" products safe is to ensure they can not connect to anybody else's methods.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when stores mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and information who purchased what.

I think that the store itself should not get this information, which is why I at all times pay money and by no means give my identify.

*Google faces lawsuit over monitoring in apps even when users opted out.*

- Google cuts off accounts for users that resell Pixel telephones. They lose entry to all of their mail and paperwork stored in Google servers underneath that account. It ought to be unlawful to place any "terms of service" on a bodily product. It should even be illegal to close an account on a service with out letting the person obtain whatever was saved there. These events provide another cause why colleges should never ask a student to make use of a service account linked to the pupil's title.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have minimize off domain-fronting, a function used to enable individuals in tyrannical nations to succeed in communication techniques which can be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to carry out special censorship of Youtube for the government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This may help the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" automatically deletes posted videos in a manner copyright legislation doesn't require.- YouTube has made private offers with the copyright trade to censor works which can be fair use. More data.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her entry to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was offered as evidence.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their own private accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never belief a remote storage firm to maintain something but a spare backup copy. Once you retailer that, put your information into an archive and encrypt it in order that the corporate cannot tell what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox legal professionals obtained Youtube to take down criticisms of a video printed by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The videos have been virtually absolutely fair use, however Youtube determined against the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's basic submission to the copyright business constrict's people's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. After all, it is not the just one, but that isn't any excuse.- Google helps the TPP due to three mostly-evil provisions that might benefit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now automatically installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for safety researchers within the US to investigate doable insecurity in Chrome. More information.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust legislation to what it was earlier than Reagan weakened it. That is why Google is using its influence to weaken those who campaign towards this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the facility of Google.

- Google advised a reporter in 2011 that internet sites with out "+1" buttons could be punished with decrease search rankings. When she revealed a story in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.